Blasting is committed to publishing high-quality papers with complete contents, implementing a strict peer review system, and using CNKI academic misconduct document detection system to check all published articles twice after submission and before publication. Strict standards of academic ethics are of great significance to purify the academic environment and promote the sound and healthy development of Blasting. The code of ethics implemented by Blasting includes but is not limited to the following:

1. The signature criteria

(1) Those who make important contributions to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of research concepts, ideas, topics, designs and data.

(2) The person who wrote the paper or modified its key contents.

(3) The person who conduct a comprehensive review and clearance, and make the final version of the final.

(4) The person who agrees to be responsible for the honesty problems in all aspects of the research work in addition to his or her own research contribution.

It is not appropriate to list the authors if all 4 criteria are not met. However, if I agreed, his or her name can be included in the acknowledgement.

2. Signature order and change

In principle, the author's signature shall be sorted according to the above principles according to the degree of contribution, which shall be jointly agreed by the author of the paper and determined before submission. After submission and publication, the author's signature shall not be changed. If it is really necessary to change, the main author in charge of the paper (the first author and corresponding author) shall submit a written application for change to the editorial office of Blasting, state the reasons, and be signed by all the signed (including the changed signed) authors for confirmation. The change can only be made after discussion and approval by the editorial office of Blasting. A change in the author's signature after a paper is published is usually published as a "correction". The author shall not change the author's signature in the revised manuscript without authorization.

Normally, only one corresponding author is identified in the paper. If the results of the paper come from multi-unit cooperative research, and if it is really necessary to increase the corresponding authors or equivalent contributors, the increase may be appropriate, generally not more than two. The work of a large team with multiple authors can be attributed to the team name, or the name of each author can be added.

 

3. The author's institution label

(1) Signature unit. A signature unit is the name of the administrative institution to which the author belongs or the institution that has completed the research. If the author's administrative institution is inconsistent with the institution that has completed the topic selection, research program design, research conditions and research work, the author shall take the institution that has provided the research conditions and completed the research work as the signature unit. If the author's organization is not relevant to the research content of the paper, the author shall state his/her contribution to the research or the author's organization shall issue a statement certifying that the author has actually engaged in the research.

(2) Multi-agency signature. If the authors belong to different institutions, in principle, only the name of the institution that has completed the research work or the institution that can provide the authorization letter for the publication of the paper can be listed as the signature unit. The names of other institutions can be added with footnotes or marked in a uniform position in the article.

(3) Name and order of cooperative units. For papers produced through collaborative research by multiple institutions, the author ranking is first determined by negotiation among the institutions, and then the unit signature ranking is determined according to the author ranking of the paper.

(4) Change of author unit. If the name of the affiliated institution of the author changes, the signature of the author unit shall be signed according to the name of the new affiliated institution and the name of the original unit shall be marked at the same time.

 

4. Plagiarism, forgery and tampering

Plagiarizing the work or scientific research of others, including ideas, concepts, results, conclusions, methods, texts, pictures, forms, images, etc., as a result of their work or achievement without indicating the source, or without properly stating the source.

(1) Self-plagiarism. The author copies the published results of himself or his team, but does not specify the source and publishes it again as a new result.

(2) Text plagiarism. The author copies the text or paragraph of an article that others have published, but does not specify the source and republishes it as part of his own article.

(3) Data, charts, formula plagiarism. The author copy the data, charts, formulas of the articles that others have published, but does not indicate the source or lack of copyright license, and republish them as part of his own article.

(4) Thought plagiarism. Publish other people's ideas as their own, in various forms, without attribution.

If a lot of words are quoted directly, although the source is indicated, but without quotation marks, it is also the category of plagiarism and must be rewritten.

Forgery refers to the recording or reporting of falsified data, information or results.

Tampering refers to fraud in the course of scientific research materials, equipment or experiments, or alteration or omission of information or results, so that scientific records do not accurately reflect research work. It should be noted that the picture should not be over-modified, otherwise it is also a tampering with data.

Blasting has the right to withdraw manuscripts for plagiarism, forgery and tampering, and the right to make real-name notices and criticism in the journal of Blasting, and the right to notify the relevant units for serious administrative punishment of the main author.

 

5. Correction

A statement of the journal to correct parts of a formally published paper (paper version, electronic version and network version) shall be published in the following cases:

There are errors in some parts of the paper, especially non-subjective or non-intentional errors.

The author's signature is incorrect and needs to be changed.

6. Withdrawal of manuscripts

Withdrawal of manuscripts is a regular error-correcting procedure and one of the work behaviors of a journal that cancels the right of publication of an officially published paper (paper version, electronic version and network version). It is published in the following cases:

(1) The paper exists a third-party writing, submission, and modification of the content of the paper.

(2) The paper has data forgery and tampering, which makes the results reported in the paper not credible.

(3) There are academic plagiarism problems in the paper. According to the classification of different ways there are text plagiarism, icon plagiarism, idea plagiarism, paragraph plagiarism, and full text plagiarism.

(4) There are problems of repeated publication and multiple submissions with one manuscript.

(5) The author provides false peer reviewer information, or the author falsifies expert recommendations.

(6) In the process of experimental design, implementation and analysis, the results reported in this paper are not credible due to the author's non-subjective error.

(7) There are violations of relevant laws and regulations.